Those were the words contractor Shawn said to Curt as he walked out of the courthouse in the town of Fairplay yesterday afternoon. Back turned, of course. I was already inside the car but I could hear it. I’m going to file that under “Things I Wouldn’t Say if I Just Soundly Lost a Court Case.” Yesterday at 3pm we faced our first contractor in a civil courtroom in order to recoup some of the money we spent finishing contracted items that were unfinished by him, or done incorrectly. Like the numerous doors and windows that were sized wrong, and the hundreds of brackets that weren’t nailed, and the beams that were put in unsupported, and the asymmetrical window overhang on the front of our house, and the unfinished Tyvek wrap, and the holes in the floor that were never patched as promised. There were many, many more items and Curt had them all documented and photographed, with emails saved and printed along with our bid. We sued for breach of contract in the amount of $6,800 (the max for a civil case is $7k).
Shawn not only did not explain or justify anything Curt presented, but he flat out lied about the nature of our contract. He stated it was on a time and materials basis, whereas what we had agreed to and brought multiple documents to prove was that we had signed a contract that was a bid listing tasks Shawn would complete for a final fee that was paid in full by us. Shawn told the judge that in spite of an original invoice, as well as a revised invoice and numerous emails that backed up Curt’s claims, that he “looked Curt in the eye and they shook hands” for this other deal. He also testified under oath that Curt never gave him a chance to fix his errors, even though Shawn stopped returning Curt’s emails and phone calls back in August. At one point, the judge seemed a little incredulous, asking Shawn why he wasn’t even defending his work. He also quickly dismissed Shawn's countersuit of $1,800 that he wanted for the fifth week of work. When you agree to a bid, the length of time you work does not matter. You are contracted to finish the work listed for the fee that was agreed upon. He stopped working and said he would not start again until Curt paid him more than what our contract was for.
Shawn not only did not explain or justify anything Curt presented, but he flat out lied about the nature of our contract. He stated it was on a time and materials basis, whereas what we had agreed to and brought multiple documents to prove was that we had signed a contract that was a bid listing tasks Shawn would complete for a final fee that was paid in full by us. Shawn told the judge that in spite of an original invoice, as well as a revised invoice and numerous emails that backed up Curt’s claims, that he “looked Curt in the eye and they shook hands” for this other deal. He also testified under oath that Curt never gave him a chance to fix his errors, even though Shawn stopped returning Curt’s emails and phone calls back in August. At one point, the judge seemed a little incredulous, asking Shawn why he wasn’t even defending his work. He also quickly dismissed Shawn's countersuit of $1,800 that he wanted for the fifth week of work. When you agree to a bid, the length of time you work does not matter. You are contracted to finish the work listed for the fee that was agreed upon. He stopped working and said he would not start again until Curt paid him more than what our contract was for.
It was apparent that the judge sided with Curt’s 20-minute testimony almost immediately. Curt’s documentation and explanation was extensive. Neither of us being all that familiar with courtrooms and lawsuits (I've never even had jury duty - not that there was a jury present - it was just us, Shawn, the judge and the sheriff), unfortunately where we made a misstep was focusing so much on proving that Shawn did poor and unfinished work, rather than bringing in documentation that would help the judge land on a dollar value to award us. I thought it was more like we would win or lose, and we would get the amount we sued for, or something like that. But I guess it’s a lot like doing your resume or taxes: quantify and justify, and back everything up. We backed up the decision easily but not the dollar value. Live and learn! But I learned another great skill of my husband’s. If he ever can’t get a job in sales, or as a realtor, or a chef, or a furniture maker, or a campaign manager, or a camp counselor, or a house builder…he should definitely audition for a courtroom drama. So while we didn’t even get a quarter of our attempted amount back, and may never see anything anyway if Shawn continues to be squirrely as he has been in the last six months, Curt and I agreed it felt good for someone to say we were right, and that we were wronged. The whole experience stung since it was right when we got started on our project, full of excitement and trust that was rooted in our urgency. The judge said as we walked out that he wished he could have awarded more, but that courts don’t award speculative damages. Luckily Curt had a little bit of documentation of the hours spent by other contractors who fixed Shawn's errors, as well as written testimony from them.
Anyway, Shawn muttered that threat to Curt outside the building while they walked to their cars because he filed an appeal. We learned from the sheriff that the appeal doesn’t revisit the decision, nor the fine, but rather whether the rules of law were followed, so perhaps Shawn should have considered bringing his own attorney in his first go around in the courtroom, not the appeal…
.jpg)
.jpg)










